Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Terrance Ó Domhnaill's avatar

I grew up on a supposed, self sustaining farm and all I remember was that it was a lot of work and we worked sun up to when we finished. We planted lots of vegetables, picked a lot of berries and fruits that my late mother would can and freeze all summer long and into the early fall. We lived in a very cold climate place so summers where short and the winters were long. We raised chickens, beef cattle and pigs for food. And we were dirt poor as well, despite having all the food we wanted. And just to add more salt to the wounds, in late summer, we would head for the woods to cut twelve to fifteen cords of wood to keep the farm house warm during the cold months. We had a wood fired kitchen range, a parlor stove in the family room, and an add on wood furnace in the basement, and the upstairs was still cold enough in the dead of winter to have hoar frost on the hardwood floors when we got up in the mornings. This was all in the late 1960's and early 1970' before I left for basic training in 1974.

Our rule, because the nearest actual grocery store was fifteen mile away, was if we didn't grow it or shoot it, we did without. This is very close to the scenario you outlined above for actual homesteading without internet and cell phones. You are right. Very few people have lived like that in recent memory and very few would be able to manage that now. If the electrical grid around the world were to collapse now, there would be a lot of dead people because they would kill each other over what they could scrounge until it was all gone. Then some of them would resort to cannibalism. Eventually, the survivors would figure out how to create small tribes of like minded people and start growing and hunting again. The bottom line is by the time that starts happening. millions of humans will have died off. That is the reality of a total grid collapse. If the world were to revert back to a pre-industrial civilization, a lot of humans will die in the process.

Given the thousands that are dying in the wars right now, that might not be a bad thing.

Expand full comment
Brenda Buck's avatar

Thank you for this. I would just take this a bit further and note that this homesteading scenario only describes the first (and maybe in rare instances, the second?) generation of survivors. As already noted, this homesteading scenario requires a civilization capable of providing, at a minimum, tools needed for chopping wood, planting seeds, mending wounds, creating clothes, etc.. We would also need a sustainable source of firewood, which is not going to be easy to do when fires are raging and no one to put them out, and destroying the very resources needed for homesteading. I think people will quickly be forced to go even further back in our history, and adapting a hunter/gatherer behavior and lifestyle is more likely. This too will be an extraordinary challenge for most modern humans who lack all of the skillsets necessary to stay alive in such a scenario. Keep in mind also that the homesteading you described occurred during a stable climate, which we no longer have. The modern, fast-changing climate puts even more pressure on all the plant and animal life on earth - the natural resources that humans need to survive. Where will the large herds of herbivores (or fish) be to sustain human populations at levels to survive regional natural hazards driven more frequent and more severe by climate change? Can populations grow crops when floods and droughts are even more common and severe? Will there be some kind of civilization and support system to move food, tools, and other resources where they are needed? At least the homesteaders had that, even if most of the time they couldn't afford it.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts